1. Luesley DM, Cullimore PC, Redman CW, et al. Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal smears. Br Med J II 1990; 300:1690-93.
2. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1054-60.
3. Bigrigg MA, Codling BW, Pearson P, Read MD, Swingler GR. Pregnancy after cervical loop diathermy. (letter) Lancet 1991; 337:119.
4. Apgar BS, Wright TC, Pfenninger JL. Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for CIN. AFP 1992; 46:505-518.
5. Gunasekera PC, Phipps JH, Lewis BV. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: A superior mode of treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:995-8.
6. Bigrigg MA, Codling BW, Pearson P, Read MD, Swingler GR. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Experience of low-voltage diathermy loop in 1000 patients. Lancet 1990; 336:229-31.
7. Murdoch JB, Morgan PR, Lopes A, Monaghan JM. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99:990-3.
8. Whiteley PF, Olah KS. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Experience with the low-voltage diathermy loop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:1272-7.
9. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet 1994; 343:32-34.
10. Raju KS, Henderson E, Trehan A. A study comparing LETZ and CO2 laser treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with and without associated human papilloma virus. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1995; 16:92-6.
11. Ferris DG, Hainer BL, Pfenninger JL, Zuber TJ, DeWitt DE, Line RL. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: The experience of family physicians. J Fam Pract 1995; 41:337-44.
12. Goff BA, Rice LW, Fleischhacker DS, Abu-Jawdeh GM, Muntz HG. Large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with exocervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Eur J Gyn Onc 1994; 15:257-62.
13. Draeby-Kristiansen J, Garsaae M, Bruun M, Hansen K. Ten years after cryosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:43-5.
14. Young C, Malvern J, Chamberlain G. Out-patient cervical cryosurgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br CommonW 1972;79:753-5.
15. Tredway DR, Townsend DE, Hovland DN, Upton RT. Colposcopy and cryosurgery in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 114:1020-4.
16. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 100:1059-60.
17. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 102:467-70.
18. Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM. Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser-generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:114-8.
19. Sawchuck WS, Webber PJ, Lowy DR, Dzubow LM. Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: Detection and protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21:41-9.
20. Mayeaux, Jr. EJ, Harper MB. Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. J Fam Pract 1993: 36:214-9.
21. Wright TC, Richart RM, Ferenczy A, Koulos J. Comparison of specimens removed by CO2 laser conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:147-53.
22. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: Cold knife, LASER, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54:175-9.
23. Crompton AC, Johnson N. Which is more painful? A randomized trial comparing loop with laser excision of the cervical transformation zone. Gynec Oncol 1994; 52:392-4.
24. Mor-Yosef S, Lopes A, Pearson S, Monaghan JM. Loop diathermy cone biopsy. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:884-6.
25. McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt, Jr. RL, Ling FW. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: Is cervical conization necessary? Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:715-9.
26. Anderson MC, Hartley RB. Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55:546-50.
27. Wright TC, Gagnon S, Richart RM, Ferenczy A. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:173-8.
28. Kobak WH, Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85:197-201
29. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:996-1000.
30. Naumann RW, Bell MC, Alvarez RD, Edwards RP, Partridge EE, Helm CW, Shingleton HM, McGee JA, Higgins RV, Hall JB. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55:224-8.
31. Spitzer M, Chernys AE, Seltzer VL. The use of large-loop excision of the transformation zone in an inner-city population. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:731-5.
32. Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP, Naumann RW, Partridge EE, Shingleton HM, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic Oncology 1994; 52:175-9.
33. Keijser KGG, Kenemans P, van der Zanden P, Schijf CPT, Vooijs GP, Rolland R. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1281-7.
34. Bigrigg MA, Codling BW, Pearson P, Read MD, Swingler GR. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Lancet 1990; 336:229-31.
35. Whiteley PF, Olah KS. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Experience with the low-voltage diathermy loop. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 162:1272-7.
36. Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS, Nayagam M, Kenney A. Histological differences between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): A cause for concern. Gyn Ocol 1991; 43:46-50.
37. Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposcopy directed punch biopsy: A potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:1273-6.
38. Howe DT, Vincenti AC. Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopy directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:588-91.
39. Prendiville W, Davies W, Berry PJ. Low voltage diathermy loop for taking cervical biopsies: A qualitative comparison with punch biopsy forceps. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 773-6.
40. Choo YC, Chan OLY, Hsu C, Ma HK. Colposcopy in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix - an enigma of diagnosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91:1156-60.
41. Benedet JL, Anderson GH, Boyes DA. Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65:557-62.
42. Townsend DE, Richart RM, Marks E, Nielsen J. Invasive cancer following outpatient evaluation and therapy for cervical disease. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57:145-9.
43. Randall T. Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedures gaining acceptance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. JAMA 1991; 266:460-62.
44. Denny LA, Soeters R, Dehaeck K, Bloch B. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ? Br J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 102:545-8.
45. Roland PT, Naumann RW, Alvarez RD, Kilgore LC, Partridge EE. A decision analysis of practice patterns used in evaluating and treating abnormal Pap smears. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 59(1): 75-80.
46. Kainz C, Tempfer C, Sliutz G, Breitenecker G, Reinthaller A. Radiosurgery in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:409-14.
47. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Arseneau J. Loop Electrosurgical Excisional
Procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: Advantages
and potential pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:332-7.
Return to LEEP Atlas Table of Contents
Return to LSUMC-S Clinical and Academic Medicine Home Page
Return to the LSUMC-S Home Page.
LSUMC-S Family Medicine. Write to us if you have comments or questions! EMayea@lsuhsc.edu